News

WHO advises that sweeteners aren’t ideal for weight loss

Sweeteners like Splenda, Truvia, and Equal are often seen as a good alternative to sugar for weight loss. But, recent guidance from the World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that this may not be the wisest choice. 

According to experts, NSS (non-sugar sweeteners) may not be the ideal solution for those aiming to lose weight, and prolonged consumption of these sweeteners could have health risks.

The WHO experts looked at recent studies examining the impact of NSS on weight loss and the health implications associated with them. The main takeaway was that sustained consumption of artificial sweeteners was correlated with increased weight and body mass index (BMI), as well as other health issues.

Among the most commonly used artificial sweeteners to avoid are aspartame (NutraSweet, Equal, Sugar Twin), stevia (Truvia), saccharin (Sweet and Low), cyclamates, sucralose (Splenda), acesulfame K (Sweet One), neotame, and advantame.

Over a decade, high intake of these products increased the risk of obesity, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular-related mortality, and all-cause mortality. Because of this, the WHO is now advising consumers to steer clear of these sweeteners in their food and beverages, particularly when aiming for weight loss or mitigating long-term disease risks.

However, the guidance comes with two exceptions: people with diabetes are not subject to these recommendations, and personal care and hygiene products containing NSS (such as toothpaste and moisturizer) do not seem to pose long-term health risks.

The guidelines state: “Non-sugar sweeteners are low- or no-calorie alternatives to free sugars that are generally marketed as aiding weight loss or maintenance of healthy weight, and are frequently recommended as a means of controlling blood glucose in individuals with diabetes. Individual sweeteners undergo toxicological assessment to establish safe levels of intake (i.e. acceptable daily intake).

However, there is no clear consensus on whether NSS are effective on long-term weight control or if they are linked to other long-term health effects at habitual intakes within the acceptable daily intake. Replacing free sugars with NSS does not help with weight control in the long term. 

People need to consider other ways to reduce free sugar intake, such as consuming food with naturally occurring sugars, like fruit, or unsweetened food and beverages. NSS are not essential dietary factors and have no nutritional value. People should reduce the sweetness of the diet altogether, starting early in life, to improve their health.” 

Liz Daunton

Recent Posts

Food & Beverage: Five regulatory development trends in 2024

After coming under pressure from consumers, regulations in the Food & Beverage sector are changing…

4 days ago

How the FTC and Congress plan to deal with shrinkflation

With inflation and rising living costs affecting more consumers, the issue of ‘shrinkflation’ is becoming…

1 week ago

Methylene chloride ban announced by the EPA over cancer risks

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a ban on methylene chloride in products for…

1 week ago

How is Ozempic affecting consumers’ food shopping habits?

Ozempic and other GLP-1 drugs are usually prescribed to treat diabetes. Recently, the endorsement of…

2 weeks ago

Dating app sued for sharing personal health information with third parties

Grindr, the world's largest dating app catering to the LGBTQ+ community, now faces legal action…

2 weeks ago

Serious illnesses reported in two US states due to fake botox injections

At least two states have seen people hospitalised with symptoms resembling botulism after undergoing cosmetic…

4 weeks ago