News

Goldman Sachs in alleged gender discrimination court case

Following recent reports that Goldman Sachs, the fifth largest bank in the US, has a gender pay gap of 55%, over 2,300 women are now filing a claim for compensation against their employer. They are claiming that the bank has discriminated against them on the grounds of gender. The ruling will cover all female employees who have worked for Goldman Sachs since 2004 in the investment banking, securities and investment management divisions.

Analisa Torres, who is a US district judge, has now given approval for further action to be taken by the employees. She said that the women have the right to start a lawsuit for the allegations that discrimination has taken place in terms of pay, giving weaker performance reviews and putting less women forward for promotions in the company.

Ms Torres also noted that the plaintiffs provided “significant proof of discriminatory disparate treatment”. However, she added that it will not include claims that the company operates a “boys’ club atmosphere”, or any of the allegations of harassment or gender stereotyping.

Kelly Dermody, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, estimated that over 2000 employees could be entitled to sue their employer. “We obviously are very, very pleased. This case is eight years old, and sometimes it’s worth the wait,” she said. This is one of the highest profile cases to be made against an employer on the ground of gender discrimination.

In the decision, the judge gave examples of unequal treatment of the plaintiffs, who were led by Cristina Chen-Oster, Mary De Luis and Allison Gamba, who were all vice presidents, and Shanna Orlich who was an associate. She commented on the pay gap, which for these claimants, was an average of 21% lower than their male colleagues.

She also noted that any future cases against the company, or any other employer in the financial services industry, would be treated on a case-by-case basis and that the industry as a whole wouldn’t be targeted. Goldman Sachs has yet to comment on the ruling.

Howard Crimsen

Recent Posts

How the FTC and Congress plan to deal with shrinkflation

With inflation and rising living costs affecting more consumers, the issue of ‘shrinkflation’ is becoming…

19 hours ago

Methylene chloride ban announced by the EPA over cancer risks

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a ban on methylene chloride in products for…

20 hours ago

How is Ozempic affecting consumers’ food shopping habits?

Ozempic and other GLP-1 drugs are usually prescribed to treat diabetes. Recently, the endorsement of…

1 week ago

Dating app sued for sharing personal health information with third parties

Grindr, the world's largest dating app catering to the LGBTQ+ community, now faces legal action…

1 week ago

Serious illnesses reported in two US states due to fake botox injections

At least two states have seen people hospitalised with symptoms resembling botulism after undergoing cosmetic…

3 weeks ago

Amazon announces the latest updates to its use of AI technology

In the last few years, Amazon, like other online retailers, has been experimenting with the…

3 weeks ago