Regulation

Bank of America Agrees to Pay Customers $66.6 Million Following Court Case

A settlement has finally been reached in the ongoing court case between Bank of America and its customers over what’s believed to be unfair overdraft fees. The bank has agreed to pay customers compensation of $66.6 million. Over 6 million customers are thought to be owed money for fees which have been paid between February 2016 and now. Bank of America’s spokesman Jerome Dubrowski has declined to comment on the case.

The lawsuit representing the customers mad the case that the extended overdraft fees being charged on customers’ accounts were unfair, and were subject to consumer protection laws which prevented excessive fees.  BOA have been charging “account fees” when customers were overdrawn for 5 or more days.  It was ruled that these should have been treated as interest payments, meaning that the rates were unlawfully high. The bank has been charging $35 as an overdraft fee, and then a further $35 if the account remains overdrawn for 5 days.

 The initial fee has been confirmed as legal, as it’s a service fee for the bank honouring the payment when there were no funds available. However, the lawsuit argued that the second fee should be treated as an interest payment. One customer was charged $35 for being overdrawn for 5 days, with balancing ranging from $3.59 to $284.86. That equates to 897% – 71,170% APR. The legal limit for interest rates in BOA’s home state North Carolina is 8%.

The recent court settlement resolves the ongoing fight, which started in 2016, claiming that the fees are subject to a ban. BOA has now agreed to stop charging its customers the extended overdraft fees for the next five years, which could save customers up to $1.2 billion. Jeffrey Kaliel, who is representing BOA’s customers, said that “Our litigation argues that extended or continuous overdraft fees like the ones Bank of America charged are actually abusive and extremely high-interest charges. Bank of America account holders will no longer have to endure these charges.”

BOA’s lawyers had argued that regulations and courts view overdraft fees differently to interest, and therefore should be treated different. The bank claims that the fee is not an interest charge, but simply a deterrent for customers to stay overdrawn. This is not the first time Bank of America has been taken to court by its customers. Last year the bank was taken to court over possible mortgage fraud in the 2008 financial crisis, and earlier in the year they were taken to court by the City of Miami over an ongoing civil rights case. This result against the bank is considered a big win for consumers.

Liz Daunton

Recent Posts

How is Ozempic affecting consumers’ food shopping habits?

Ozempic and other GLP-1 drugs are usually prescribed to treat diabetes. Recently, the endorsement of…

5 days ago

Dating app sued for sharing personal health information with third parties

Grindr, the world's largest dating app catering to the LGBTQ+ community, now faces legal action…

6 days ago

Serious illnesses reported in two US states due to fake botox injections

At least two states have seen people hospitalised with symptoms resembling botulism after undergoing cosmetic…

2 weeks ago

Amazon announces the latest updates to its use of AI technology

In the last few years, Amazon, like other online retailers, has been experimenting with the…

3 weeks ago

Cocoa shortages continue to push up the price of chocolate

According to the latest figures, the price of chocolate has been steadily increasing, with experts…

3 weeks ago

Apple introduces a new update to stop iPhones from being stolen

In recent months, Apple has been working on App Store changes, CarPlay and HomeKit improvements.…

3 weeks ago